in News.

The Mental Capacity Act principles explained

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 is a set of laws that were passed by Parliament, which are designed to protect and give power to vulnerable people who lack the mental capacity to make their own decisions. It came into force in England and Wales in 2007. Whilst not perfect, they are significant in safeguarding the lives of people who may lack mental capacity.

The five principles of the Mental Capacity Act

There are five key principles that form the basis of the Act. These principles are of such importance, that they are set out at the start, before the legal test to determine if a person lacks mental capacity.

These five principles are:

  1. Presumption of capacity
  2. Support to make a decision
  3. Ability to make unwise decisions
  4. Best interest
  5. Least restrictive

The 4th and 5th principles apply only when a person has been assessed to not have mental capacity for the decision in question. Whilst it is not a principle of the Act, it is key to remember that mental capacity is time and decision specific.

1. Presumption of capacity

The first and most important principle is the presumption of capacity. This means it is assumed that everyone has capacity until proved otherwise. A lack of capacity should not automatically be assumed simply based on a person’s age, appearance, condition or behaviour. Similarly, just because a person has lacked capacity to make a previous decision, this does not necessarily mean they cannot make the decision in question. For example, a lack of capacity to manage finances, does not mean a person lacks capacity to decide where they want to live.

2. Support to make a decision

The supported decision principle requires that all practical steps should be taken, to help the person make the decision themselves before treating them as unable to make the decision. This means in practice it is important to consider how and when the person is being asked to make the decision. Is there a time of day when they are more alert? What is the most appropriate way to communicate with them? Have they been provided with all the relevant information? Can location have an effect? Do they need assistance from someone? Often, we can wrongly think a person does not have capacity, simply because we have not taken the time or effort to explain it in a way they can understand.

3. Ability to make unwise decisions

The third principle states a person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision, merely because they make an unwise decision. This is where the focus of assessing a person’s capacity needs to be based on how the person makes the decision, rather than the decision they make. In effect, the decision itself should be irrelevant. If we base our assessment of capacity on the decision, then we are applying our own or society’s beliefs and values to the decision, not the person’s.

4. Best interest

The fourth principle requires that if a decision is made (or an act done) on behalf of a person who does not have mental capacity, then it must be made (done) in their best interest. There is no specific answer as to what is in a person’s best interest, as every decision is unique to the person and circumstances involved. Unfortunately, there is no legal definition of best interest. There is, however, a procedure set out in s.4 of the Mental Capacity Act which should be followed and will assist when making a best interest decision.

5. Least restrictive

Finally, if a decision is made (or an act done) on behalf of a person who does not have mental capacity, it should ideally be the least restrictive option of the person’s rights and freedoms. Other less restrictive options should be considered and applied if at all possible.

This article has been produced by Ashtons Legal

Brain Injury Group member firm Ashtons Legal represent Clients nationwide following brain injuries.

Ashton Legal’s Medical Negligence team are nationally recognised and have been ranked as top tier consistently for over 20 years by independent sources such as The Legal 500 and Chambers UK.

LAWS – providing initial free legal advice

Legal & Welfare Service (LAWS) online for brain injury help, advice and support

What is the Brain Injury Group?

Brain Injury Group is a free service designed to connect those affected by a brain injury (whether there is a claim or not) to a range of experts who may be able to offer advice and assistance.

If you’d like to find out more about the work of Brain Injury Group, you are at the right place! You can follow the links below to:

The Brain Injury Group exists to support individuals and families affected by brain injury and the health and social care professionals working in this specialist field. Our mission is to provide anyone affected by brain injury with access to advice on legal, financial and welfare benefit issues delivered by proven experts in the field who have been chosen not only for their skills and knowledge, but also for their passion and dedication to helping people.

As well as providing legal and welfare advice, Brain Injury Group provide training for legal, health and social care professionals. View our award winning Brain Injury Group brain injury training events.

The Brain Injury Group brain injury directory

The BIG Brain Injury Services Directory

How can Brain Injury Group help you?

If you would like advice about bringing a brain injury claim, capacity, deputyships, managing the award of compensation or any other aspect of brain injury welfare, legal or financial advice, we have specialist brain injury solicitors and Court of Protection solicitors who can assist.

You can find full details of Brain Injury Group members on our website or there are several ways to get in touch:

  1. Call us on 0800 612 9660 or 01737 852203
  2. Email us at enquiries@braininjurygroup.co.uk
  3. Complete this short enquiry form and we’ll get back to you
  4. Find a specialist brain injury solicitor near to you